
GRID M10-8Q

Radeon HD 8770
GRID M10-8Q vs Radeon HD 8770 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID M10-8Q vs Radeon HD 8770 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID M10-8Q vs Radeon HD 8770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID M10-8Q
2016Why buy it
- β More future proof: Maxwell (2014β2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β1566.7% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 17.4 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- β350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.
- β11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
Radeon HD 8770
2013Why buy it
- β Costs $2,350 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- β Delivers 1574.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- β Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.
- β Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- β2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M10-8Q vs Radeon HD 8770 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-8Q
The GRID M10-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points.

Radeon HD 8770
The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-8Q scores 2,595 and the Radeon HD 8770 reaches 2,607 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-8Q is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 8770 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-8Q) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8770). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-8Q) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 825 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M10-8Q | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,595 | 2,607 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS+164% | 0.6336 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz+58% | 825 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+233% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-8Q | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-8Q and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8770. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-8Q) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 8770) β the GRID M10-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-8Q | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GRID M10-8Q) vs 12_0 (Radeon HD 8770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID M10-8Q | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (4th Gen) (GRID M10-8Q) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon HD 8770). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs UVD 4.0.
| Feature | GRID M10-8Q | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (4th Gen) | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (2nd Gen) | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | β |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 8770's 50W β a 127.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID M10-8Q | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 50W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 11.5 | 52.1+353% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID M10-8Q came in at $2500, while the Radeon HD 8770 launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8770 was 94% cheaper ($2350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (GRID M10-8Q) vs 17.4 (Radeon HD 8770) β the Radeon HD 8770 offers 1640% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-8Q (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID M10-8Q | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $150-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.0 | 17.4+1640% |
| Codename | GM107 | Mars |
| Release | May 18 2016 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #622 | #844 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














