GRID M10-2Q vs GRID M10-8Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-2Q vs GRID M10-8Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M10-2Q vs GRID M10-8Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID M10-8Q

2016

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌26600% longer card at 267mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M10-2Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (2,692 vs 2,595), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M10-2Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID M10-2Q makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $2,500 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3.7% (1.1 vs 1.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GRID M10-2Q vs GRID M10-8Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-2Q

The GRID M10-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points.

GRID M10-8Q

The GRID M10-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-2Q scores 2,692 and the GRID M10-8Q reaches 2,595 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GRID M10-8Q uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 640 (GRID M10-8Q). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2Q) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-8Q). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1306 MHz.

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	GRID M10-8Q
G3D Mark Score	2,692+4%	2,595
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+220%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+189%	1.672 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz	1306 MHz+11%
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	128+220%	40
L1 Cache	768 KB+140%	320 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	GRID M10-8Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-2Q and 64-bit on the GRID M10-8Q.

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	GRID M10-8Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 12 (12_1) (GRID M10-8Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	GRID M10-8Q
DirectX	12_1	12 (12_1)
Max Displays	0	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-2Q draws 225W versus the GRID M10-8Q's 225W — a 0% difference. The GRID M10-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2Q) vs 350W (GRID M10-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	GRID M10-8Q
TDP	225W	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	—	85
Perf/Watt	12.0+4%	11.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-2Q came in at $2500, while the GRID M10-8Q launched at $2500. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.1 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 1.0 (GRID M10-8Q) — the GRID M10-2Q offers 10% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-8Q (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	GRID M10-8Q
MSRP	$2500	$2500
Performance per Dollar	1.1+10%	1.0
Codename	GM204	GM107
Release	August 30 2015	May 18 2016
Ranking	#433	#622

Search GRID M10-2Q on Amazon

Search GRID M10-8Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.