GRID K2 vs GRID M10-2Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K2 vs GRID M10-2Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K2 vs GRID M10-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K2

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
108% HIGHER MSRP
$5,199 MSRPvs$2,500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($5,199 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

GRID M10-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,699 less on MSRP ($2,500 MSRP vs $5,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 104.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.1 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $5,199 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K2 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (2,737 vs 2,692), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID M10-2Q makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,699 cheaper on MSRP at $2,500 vs $5,199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 104.5% (1.1 vs 0.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID M10-2Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID K2 has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K2 vs GRID M10-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K2

The GRID K2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,737 points. Launch price was $5,199.

GRID M10-2Q

The GRID M10-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K2 scores 2,737 and the GRID M10-2Q reaches 2,692 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K2 is built on Kepler while the GRID M10-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K2) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-2Q). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K2) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2Q).

Feature	GRID K2	GRID M10-2Q
G3D Mark Score	2,737+2%	2,692
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536 ×2	2048+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS ×2	4.825 TFLOPS+111%
ROPs	32 ×2	64+100%
TMUs	128 ×2	128
L1 Cache	128 KB	768 KB+500%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K2	GRID M10-2Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K2 and 64-bit on the GRID M10-2Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K2) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-2Q) — the GRID M10-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K2	GRID M10-2Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K2 draws 225W versus the GRID M10-2Q's 225W — a 0% difference. The GRID M10-2Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K2) vs 350W (GRID M10-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID K2	GRID M10-2Q
TDP	225W	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	12.2+2%	12.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K2 came in at $5199, while the GRID M10-2Q launched at $2500. On MSRP, GRID M10-2Q was 51.9% cheaper ($2699 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (GRID K2) vs 1.1 (GRID M10-2Q) — the GRID M10-2Q offers 120% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-2Q (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID K2	GRID M10-2Q
MSRP	$5199	$2500-52%
Performance per Dollar	0.5	1.1+120%
Codename	GK104	GM204
Release	May 11 2013	August 30 2015
Ranking	#611	#433

Search GRID K2 on Amazon

Search GRID M10-2Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.