GRID M10-2Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4150
GRID M10-2Q
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro WX 4150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M10-2Q is positioned at rank 342 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 is on rank 155, so the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-2Q
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4150
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M10-2Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro WX 4150 holds the technical lead. Priced at $120 (vs $150), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 22.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+22.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-2Q and Radeon Pro WX 4150
GRID M10-2Q
The GRID M10-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points.
Radeon Pro WX 4150
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-2Q scores 2,692 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 reaches 2,642 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2Q) vs 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1053 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,692+2% | 2,642 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+129% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+156% | 1.887 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+12% | 1053 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+129% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+243% | 224 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M10-2Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-2Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the GRID M10-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-2Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 50W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.0 | 52.8+340% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-2Q launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300 and now averages $120. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 costs 20% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.9 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 22.0 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 22.9% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $300-88% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $120-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.9 | 22.0+23% |
| Codename | GM204 | Baffin |
| Release | August 30 2015 | March 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #433 | #620 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M10-2Q and Radeon Pro WX 4150
