
GRID M10-2Q

Radeon RX 550
GRID M10-2Q vs Radeon RX 550 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID M10-2Q vs Radeon RX 550 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID M10-2Q vs Radeon RX 550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID M10-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 155mm, a 154mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌3064.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 33.8 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
Radeon RX 550
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,421 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3043.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅GRID M10-2Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 550 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌15400% longer card at 155mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M10-2Q vs Radeon RX 550 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-2Q
The GRID M10-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points.

Radeon RX 550
The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-2Q scores 2,692 and the Radeon RX 550 reaches 2,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2Q) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,692 | 2,674 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+300% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+298% | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1183 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+500% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GRID M10-2Q does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M10-2Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 550 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 550 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-2Q and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 550. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-2Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 550) — the GRID M10-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 12_0 (Radeon RX 550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-2Q draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 550's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2Q) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 1mm vs 155mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 50W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 1mm | 155mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 12.0 | 53.5+346% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID M10-2Q came in at $2500, while the Radeon RX 550 launched at $79. On MSRP, Radeon RX 550 was 96.8% cheaper ($2421 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.1 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 33.8 (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon RX 550 offers 2972.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 550 (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $79-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.1 | 33.8+2973% |
| Codename | GM204 | Lexa |
| Release | August 30 2015 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #433 | #617 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















