GeForce GTX 560 vs GRID M10-2Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 vs GRID M10-2Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 vs GRID M10-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,301 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1191.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID M10-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1156.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 13.9 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 560 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (2,768 vs 2,692), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 560 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 560 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,301 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1191.7% (13.9 vs 1.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 560 vs GRID M10-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560

The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.

GRID M10-2Q

The GRID M10-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 scores 2,768 and the GRID M10-2Q reaches 2,692 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GRID M10-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 560) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-2Q). Raw compute: 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2Q).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	GRID M10-2Q
G3D Mark Score	2,768+3%	2,692
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	336	2048+510%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.089 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+343%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	128+129%
L1 Cache	448 KB	768 KB+71%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M10-2Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	GRID M10-2Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-2Q carries 2 GB. GRID M10-2Q gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 and 64-bit on the GRID M10-2Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 560) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-2Q) — the GRID M10-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	GRID M10-2Q
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	2 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 draws 150W versus the GRID M10-2Q's 225W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560) vs 350W (GRID M10-2Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	GRID M10-2Q
TDP	150W-33%	225W
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	18.5+54%	12.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 came in at $199, while the GRID M10-2Q launched at $2500. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 560 was 92% cheaper ($2301 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.9 (GeForce GTX 560) vs 1.1 (GRID M10-2Q) — the GeForce GTX 560 offers 1163.6% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-2Q (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	GRID M10-2Q
MSRP	$199-92%	$2500
Performance per Dollar	13.9+1164%	1.1
Codename	GF114	GM204
Release	May 17 2011	August 30 2015
Ranking	#605	#433

Search GeForce GTX 560 on Amazon

Search GRID M10-2Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.