GRID M10-2Q
VS
Quadro K4000

GRID M10-2Q vs Quadro K4000

GRID M10-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K4000

2013Core: 810 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M10-2Q is positioned at rank 342 and the Quadro K4000 is on rank 283, so the Quadro K4000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-2Q

#117
L40
MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174
97%
#327
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
13679%
#342
GRID M10-2Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
100%
#343
Tesla K80
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50
99%
#344
GRID M10-4Q
MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340
98%
#346
GRID M10-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
96%
#347
FirePro V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170
95%
#348
Quadro FX 3800
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
95%
#350
GRID K520
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50
91%
#351
GRID P40-12Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
90%
#352
FirePro 2270
MSRP: $149|Avg: $30
88%
#353
FirePro 2460
MSRP: $180|Avg: $10
87%
#355
FirePro 3D V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
84%
#356
Quadro FX 580
MSRP: $199|Avg: $500
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K4000

#110
Quadro GV100
MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999
99%
#111
Tesla P40
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $150
97%
#112
GRID RTX6000-1Q
MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500
93%
#113
Quadro RTX 8000
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999
93%
#114
Quadro GP100
MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335
92%
#268
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
6903%
#283
Quadro K4000
MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100
100%
#285
GRID P4-2Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $235
99%
#287
Tesla C2070
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $38
97%
#288
Quadro 2000 D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
97%
#290
FirePro V5900
MSRP: $599|Avg: $15
96%
#291
FirePro S9000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156
94%
#294
GRID P40-4Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
93%
#295
RTXA5000-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
92%
#296
GRID P6-2Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-2Q.

InsightGRID M10-2QQuadro K4000
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Leading raw performance (+1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro K4000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K4000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $150), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 51.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGRID M10-2QQuadro K4000
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+51.5%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)
More affordable ($100)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-2Q and Quadro K4000

NVIDIA

GRID M10-2Q

The GRID M10-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K4000

The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-2Q scores 2,692 and the Quadro K4000 reaches 2,719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro K4000 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 768 (Quadro K4000). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2Q) vs 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000).

FeatureGRID M10-2QQuadro K4000
G3D Mark Score
2,692
2,719+1%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048+167%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+288%
1.244 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+167%
24
TMUs
128+100%
64
L1 Cache
768 KB+1100%
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+426%
0.38 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M10-2QQuadro K4000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M10-2Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4000 has 3 GB. The Quadro K4000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-2Q) vs 0.38 MB (Quadro K4000) — the GRID M10-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID M10-2QQuadro K4000
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
3 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+426%
0.38 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-2Q draws 225W versus the Quadro K4000's 80W — a 95.1% difference. The Quadro K4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2Q) vs 350W (Quadro K4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID M10-2QQuadro K4000
TDP
225W
80W-64%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
12.0
34.0+183%
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID M10-2Q launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Quadro K4000 launched at $1269 and now averages $100. The Quadro K4000 costs 33.3% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.9 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 27.2 (Quadro K4000) — the Quadro K4000 offers 52% better value. The GRID M10-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGRID M10-2QQuadro K4000
MSRP
$2500
$1269-49%
Avg Price (30d)
$150
$100-33%
Performance per Dollar
17.9
27.2+52%
Codename
GM204
GK106
Release
August 30 2015
March 1 2013
Ranking
#433
#613