GRID M10-2Q
Quadro K4000
GRID M10-2Q vs Quadro K4000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID M10-2Q vs Quadro K4000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GRID M10-2Q vs Quadro K4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID M10-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌97% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$1,269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).
- ❌181.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 80W.
Quadro K4000
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,231 less on MSRP ($1,269 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 99% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($1,269 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 225W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M10-2Q vs Quadro K4000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GRID M10-2Q
The GRID M10-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points.
Quadro K4000
The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-2Q scores 2,692 and the Quadro K4000 reaches 2,719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro K4000 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 768 (Quadro K4000). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2Q) vs 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000).
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,692 | 2,719+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+167% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+288% | 1.244 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+167% | 24 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+1100% | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+426% | 0.38 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M10-2Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4000 carries 3 GB. Quadro K4000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-2Q and 64-bit on the Quadro K4000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-2Q) vs 0.38 MB (Quadro K4000) — the GRID M10-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 3 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+426% | 0.38 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-2Q draws 225W versus the Quadro K4000's 80W — a 95.1% difference. The Quadro K4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2Q) vs 350W (Quadro K4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 80W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.0 | 34.0+183% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID M10-2Q came in at $2500, while the Quadro K4000 launched at $1269. On MSRP, Quadro K4000 was 49.2% cheaper ($1231 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.1 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 2.1 (Quadro K4000) — the Quadro K4000 offers 90.9% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-2Q (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $1269-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.1 | 2.1+91% |
| Codename | GM204 | GK106 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #433 | #613 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M10-2Q and Quadro K4000
