GRID M10-2Q
VS
FirePro V9800

GRID M10-2Q vs FirePro V9800

GRID M10-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
VS

FirePro V9800

2011Core: 725 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M10-2Q is positioned at rank 342 and the FirePro V9800 is on rank 368, so the GRID M10-2Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-2Q

#117
L40
MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174
97%
#327
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
13679%
#342
GRID M10-2Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
100%
#343
Tesla K80
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50
99%
#344
GRID M10-4Q
MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340
98%
#346
GRID M10-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
96%
#347
FirePro V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170
95%
#348
Quadro FX 3800
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
95%
#350
GRID K520
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50
91%
#351
GRID P40-12Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
90%
#352
FirePro 2270
MSRP: $149|Avg: $30
88%
#353
FirePro 2460
MSRP: $180|Avg: $10
87%
#355
FirePro 3D V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
84%
#356
Quadro FX 580
MSRP: $199|Avg: $500
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V9800

#353
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
18940%
#368
FirePro V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250
100%
#369
FirePro V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $20
100%
#370
FirePro 3D V8750
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500
91%
#371
FirePro 3D V7750
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
87%
#372
GRID M10-2B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80
85%
#373
Quadro FX 370
MSRP: $129|Avg: $500
83%
#374
Quadro 6000
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150
78%
#375
GRID M6-0B
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
78%
#376
RTXA5000-6Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
78%
#377
GRID M10-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
77%
#378
Tesla K40c
MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500
74%
#379
Quadro FX 4800
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80
72%
#380
Tesla M2090
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40
72%
#381
GRID K2
MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80
68%
#382
GRID K180Q
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000
68%
#383
Quadro CX
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500
60%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro V9800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-2Q.

InsightGRID M10-2QFirePro V9800
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)
Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GRID M10-2Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID M10-2Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $250), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 64.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGRID M10-2QFirePro V9800
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+64.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($150)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-2Q and FirePro V9800

NVIDIA

GRID M10-2Q

The GRID M10-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points.

AMD

FirePro V9800

The FirePro V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,727 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-2Q scores 2,692 and the FirePro V9800 reaches 2,727 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the FirePro V9800 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 1,280 (FirePro V9800). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2Q) vs 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V9800).

FeatureGRID M10-2QFirePro V9800
G3D Mark Score
2,692
2,727+1%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TeraScale 3
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
2048+60%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+160%
1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
128+60%
80
L1 Cache
768 KB+140%
320 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M10-2QFirePro V9800
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M10-2Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V9800 has 4 GB. The FirePro V9800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-2Q) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro V9800) — the GRID M10-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID M10-2QFirePro V9800
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 11.2 (FirePro V9800). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.

FeatureGRID M10-2QFirePro V9800
DirectX
12_1+7%
11.2
Max Displays
0
6
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-2Q draws 225W versus the FirePro V9800's 150W — a 40% difference. The FirePro V9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2Q) vs 350W (FirePro V9800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGRID M10-2QFirePro V9800
TDP
225W
150W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
12.0
18.2+52%
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID M10-2Q launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the FirePro V9800 launched at $3499 and now averages $250. The GRID M10-2Q costs 40% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.9 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 10.9 (FirePro V9800) — the GRID M10-2Q offers 64.2% better value. The GRID M10-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureGRID M10-2QFirePro V9800
MSRP
$2500-29%
$3499
Avg Price (30d)
$150-40%
$250
Performance per Dollar
17.9+64%
10.9
Codename
GM204
Cayman
Release
August 30 2015
May 24 2011
Ranking
#433
#656