GRID M10-2Q vs GeForce GTX 560

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID M10-2Q is positioned at rank #342 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-2Q

#117

L40

MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174

97%

#327

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

13679%

#342

GRID M10-2Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150

100%

#343

Tesla K80

MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50

99%

#344

GRID M10-4Q

MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340

98%

#346

GRID M10-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500

96%

#347

FirePro V8700

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170

95%

#348

Quadro FX 3800

MSRP: $799|Avg: $20

95%

#350

GRID K520

MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50

91%

#351

GRID P40-12Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699

90%

#352

FirePro 2270

MSRP: $149|Avg: $30

88%

#353

FirePro 2460

MSRP: $180|Avg: $10

87%

#355

FirePro 3D V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

84%

#356

Quadro FX 580

MSRP: $199|Avg: $500

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 560 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID M10-2Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GRID M10-2Q	GeForce GTX 560
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 560 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $150), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 414.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GRID M10-2Q	GeForce GTX 560
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+414.1%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GRID M10-2Q Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 560 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-2Q and GeForce GTX 560

GRID M10-2Q

The GRID M10-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points.

GeForce GTX 560

The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-2Q scores 2,692 and the GeForce GTX 560 reaches 2,768 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 560 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 560). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2Q) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560).

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	GeForce GTX 560
G3D Mark Score	2,692	2,768+3%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	2048+510%	336
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+343%	1.089 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	128+129%	56
L1 Cache	768 KB+71%	448 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	GeForce GTX 560
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M10-2Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 has 1 GB. The GRID M10-2Q offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-2Q) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 560) — the GRID M10-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	GeForce GTX 560
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-2Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 560's 150W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2Q) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	GeForce GTX 560
TDP	225W	150W-33%
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	12.0	18.5+54%

💰

Value Analysis

The GRID M10-2Q launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 560 launched at $199 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 560 costs 80% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.9 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 92.3 (GeForce GTX 560) — the GeForce GTX 560 offers 415.6% better value. The GRID M10-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).