GRID M10-2Q vs GRID K2
GRID M10-2Q
Popular choices:
GRID K2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M10-2Q is positioned at rank 342 and the GRID K2 is on rank 381, so the GRID M10-2Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-2Q
Performance Per Dollar GRID K2
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID K2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-2Q.
| Insight | GRID M10-2Q | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID K2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID K2 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $150), it costs 47% less, resulting in a 90.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M10-2Q | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+90.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-2Q and GRID K2
GRID M10-2Q
The GRID M10-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points.
GRID K2
The GRID K2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,737 points. Launch price was $5,199.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-2Q scores 2,692 and the GRID K2 reaches 2,737 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GRID K2 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 1,536 (GRID K2). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2Q) vs 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K2).
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,692 | 2,737+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+111% | 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+500% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-2Q) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K2) — the GRID M10-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-2Q draws 225W versus the GRID K2's 225W — a 0% difference. The GRID K2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2Q) vs 350W (GRID K2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-2Q launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GRID K2 launched at $5199 and now averages $80. The GRID K2 costs 46.7% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.9 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 34.2 (GRID K2) — the GRID K2 offers 91.1% better value. The GRID M10-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500-52% | $5199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $80-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.9 | 34.2+91% |
| Codename | GM204 | GK104 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | May 11 2013 |
| Ranking | #433 | #611 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M10-2Q and GRID K2
