GRID M10-2Q vs Radeon Pro 450

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-2Q vs Radeon Pro 450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M10-2Q vs Radeon Pro 450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌542.9% higher power demand at 225W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro 450

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 225W, a 190W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro 450 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (2,723 vs 2,692), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M10-2Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID M10-2Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon Pro 450 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID M10-2Q vs Radeon Pro 450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-2Q

The GRID M10-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points.

Radeon Pro 450

The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-2Q scores 2,692 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2Q) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	Radeon Pro 450
G3D Mark Score	2,692	2,723+1%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2048+220%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+371%	1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	128+220%	40
L1 Cache	768 KB+380%	160 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	Radeon Pro 450
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-2Q and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 450. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-2Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) — the GRID M10-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	Radeon Pro 450
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	Radeon Pro 450
DirectX	12_1	12_0
Max Displays	0	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-2Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 146.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	Radeon Pro 450
TDP	225W	35W-84%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	1mm
Slots	0	0
Perf/Watt	12.0	77.8+548%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-2Q came in at $2500, while the Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 450 was 100+% cheaper ($2500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.1 (GRID M10-2Q) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 450 (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	Radeon Pro 450
MSRP	$2500	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	1.1	Infinity
Codename	GM204	Baffin
Release	August 30 2015	October 30 2016
Ranking	#433	#612

Search GRID M10-2Q on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 450 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.