GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GeForce GTX 560
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 560
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than GeForce GTX 560?
Comparing the powerful GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB to the legacy mid-range GeForce GTX 560 highlights over fifteen years of astronomical GPU progress. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more than 4000% faster, representing the jump from a core that pioneered 1080p stability in 2011 to an iconic powerhouse that masters 1440p Ultra and introduces world-class Ray Tracing depth.
Technically, these two share no ground. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB features a massive 16GB VRAM buffer and specialized hardware for Ray Tracing and DLSS 3 Frame Generation. The GeForce GTX 560 remains a robust piece of hardware history, but it lacks the core count and feature set—like modern Path Tracing—needed for uncompromised graphics in 2026. Moving from any legacy desktop to a 40-series discrete engine is a life-changing improvement for most users seeking uncompromised speed.
There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the absolute winner. it provides a level of detail and speed that turns the most demanding games into fluid, immersive experiences. The GeForce GTX 560 is now strictly piece of hardware history. If you are looking to revitalize your PC experience with a performance boost that is truly night and day, the 16GB 40-series card is the superior and definitive choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2011). The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 560 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 718.3% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (8 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 560.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+718.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-718.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 560 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $380 for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, it costs 92% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 54.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+54.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and GeForce GTX 560
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
GeForce GTX 560
The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the GeForce GTX 560's 2,768 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 718.3%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 560 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 560). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+718% | 2,768 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+1195% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+1926% | 1.089 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 136+143% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+877% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+6300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 560 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 560 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 has 1 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 560) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+700% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+6300% | 0.5 MB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 560).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | — |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | — |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the GeForce GTX 560's 150W — a 6.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 150W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+665% | 18.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the GeForce GTX 560 launched at $199 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 560 costs 92.1% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 92.3 (GeForce GTX 560) — the GeForce GTX 560 offers 54.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $199-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $30-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.6 | 92.3+55% |
| Codename | AD106 | GF114 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | May 17 2011 |
| Ranking | #59 | #605 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and GeForce GTX 560
