GRID M10-8Q vs Quadro 6000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-8Q vs Quadro 6000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M10-8Q vs Quadro 6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-8Q

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,899 less on MSRP ($2,500 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 69.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro 6000

2010

Why buy it

✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
76% HIGHER MSRP
$4,399 MSRPvs$2,500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 6000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (2,692 vs 2,595), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M10-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID M10-8Q makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,899 cheaper on MSRP at $2,500 vs $4,399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 69.6% (1.0 vs 0.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro 6000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID M10-8Q vs Quadro 6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-8Q

The GRID M10-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points.

Quadro 6000

The Quadro 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 10 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $4,399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-8Q scores 2,595 and the Quadro 6000 reaches 2,692 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-8Q is built on Maxwell while the Quadro 6000 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-8Q) vs 448 (Quadro 6000). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-8Q) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Quadro 6000).

Feature	GRID M10-8Q	Quadro 6000
G3D Mark Score	2,595	2,692+4%
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	640+43%	448
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.672 TFLOPS+63%	1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	40	56+40%
L1 Cache	320 KB	896 KB+180%
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-8Q	Quadro 6000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M10-8Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 6000 carries 6 GB. Quadro 6000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-8Q and 64-bit on the Quadro 6000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-8Q) vs 0.75 MB (Quadro 6000) — the GRID M10-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M10-8Q	Quadro 6000
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	6 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-8Q draws 225W versus the Quadro 6000's 204W — a 9.8% difference. The Quadro 6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-8Q) vs 350W (Quadro 6000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID M10-8Q	Quadro 6000
TDP	225W	204W-9%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	11.5	13.2+15%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-8Q came in at $2500, while the Quadro 6000 launched at $4399. On MSRP, GRID M10-8Q was 43.2% cheaper ($1899 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (GRID M10-8Q) vs 0.6 (Quadro 6000) — the GRID M10-8Q offers 66.7% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-8Q (2016 vs 2010).

Feature	GRID M10-8Q	Quadro 6000
MSRP	$2500-43%	$4399
Performance per Dollar	1.0+67%	0.6
Codename	GM107	GF100
Release	May 18 2016	December 10 2010
Ranking	#622	#615

Search GRID M10-8Q on Amazon

Search Quadro 6000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.