MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon RX 550

NVIDIA

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012Core: 620 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 550

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz
Similar parts
·······

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon RX 550 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon RX 550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 33.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Radeon RX 550

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 550 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 550 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (2,674 vs 2,637), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 550 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 550 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon RX 550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 550

The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M scores 2,637 and the Radeon RX 550 reaches 2,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon RX 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550).

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon RX 550
G3D Mark Score
2,637
2,674+1%
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9523 TFLOPS
1.211 TFLOPS+27%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
64+100%
32
L1 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 550 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon RX 550
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 550 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 550 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 550.

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon RX 550
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 12_0 (Radeon RX 550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon RX 550
DirectX
11.0
12_0+9%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 550).

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon RX 550
Encoder
PureVideo HD
VCE 3.4
Decoder
VP4
UVD 6.3
Codecs
MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 550's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon RX 550
TDP
100W
50W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
155mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
26.4
53.5+103%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 550 (2017 vs 2012).

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon RX 550
MSRP
$79
Codename
GF114
Lexa
Release
March 22 2012
April 20 2017
Ranking
#704
#617

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.