Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012Core: 620 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2017Core: 1002 MHzBoost: 1053 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 Performance Spectrum

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
2 GB 100
2,637
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 285
brand logoGeForce GTX 650
brand logoGeForce GTX 480M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 460
brand logoGeForce GTX 980M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 12GB
brand logoRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Radeon Pro WX 4150
4 GB 50
2,642
+0.2%
brand logoRadeon R7 M370
brand logoRadeon HD 5830
brand logoRadeon R9 350
brand logoRadeon R9 M470
brand logoRadeon RX 6500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7400
brand logoRadeon RX 7800M
brand logoRadeon RX 6750 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon Pro WX 4150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2017

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (2,642 vs 2,637), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 4150 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has the stronger long-term case.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4150

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M scores 2,637 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 reaches 2,642 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150).

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon Pro WX 4150
G3D Mark Score
2,637
2,642
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
896+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9523 TFLOPS
1.887 TFLOPS+98%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
64+14%
56
L1 Cache
512 KB+129%
224 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon Pro WX 4150
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 4150 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4150. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon Pro WX 4150
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon Pro WX 4150
DirectX
11.0
12 (12_0)+9%
OpenGL
4.2
4.6+10%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4150).

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon Pro WX 4150
Encoder
PureVideo HD
VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder
VP4
UVD 6.3
Codecs
MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264
H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon Pro WX 4150
TDP
100W
50W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
—
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
26.4
52.8+100%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 4150 (2017 vs 2012).

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon Pro WX 4150
MSRP
—
$300
Codename
GF114
Baffin
Release
March 22 2012
March 1 2017
Ranking
#704
#620
Search MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M on AmazonSearch Radeon Pro WX 4150 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.