MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012Core: 620 MHz

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2017Core: 1002 MHzBoost: 1053 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

100

2,637

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2,642

+0.2%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is positioned at rank 16 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 is on rank 155, so the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

124%

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

112%

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

112%

#13

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

102%

#14

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

101%

#16

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#18

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

99%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4150

#72

Quadro P4200

MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110

98%

#74

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095

86%

#140

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1677%

#155

Radeon Pro WX 4150

MSRP: $300|Avg: $120

100%

#158

Quadro M2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $70

98%

#159

Quadro M4000

MSRP: $791|Avg: $350

96%

#160

FirePro W4100

MSRP: $183|Avg: $183

93%

#166

FirePro W5100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

85%

#167

Radeon Pro WX 4170

MSRP: $400|Avg: $120

81%

#168

FirePro W4300

MSRP: $379|Avg: $50

81%

#169

Quadro K2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

81%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M.

Insight	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro WX 4150
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro WX 4150 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 4150 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and Radeon Pro WX 4150

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4150

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M scores 2,637 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 reaches 2,642 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150).

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro WX 4150
G3D Mark Score	2,637	2,642
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	896+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9523 TFLOPS	1.887 TFLOPS+98%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	64+14%	56
L1 Cache	512 KB+129%	224 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro WX 4150
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro WX 4150
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro WX 4150
DirectX	11.0	12 (12_0)+9%
OpenGL	4.2	4.6+10%
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4150).

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro WX 4150
Encoder	PureVideo HD	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder	VP4	UVD 6.3
Codecs	MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.