MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon Pro 450

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon Pro 450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon Pro 450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌185.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro 450

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 100W, a 65W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro 450 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.3% in PassMark G3D (2,723 vs 2,637), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro 450 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro 450 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has the stronger long-term case.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon Pro 450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

Radeon Pro 450

The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M scores 2,637 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro 450
G3D Mark Score	2,637	2,723+3%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9523 TFLOPS	1.024 TFLOPS+8%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	64+60%	40
L1 Cache	512 KB+220%	160 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 450 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro 450
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 450. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro 450
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro 450
DirectX	11.0	12_0+9%
Max Displays	2	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 450). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 6.3.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro 450
Encoder	PureVideo HD	VCE 3.4
Decoder	VP4	UVD 6.3
Codecs	MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 96.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro 450
TDP	100W	35W-65%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	26.4	77.8+195%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro 450 (2016 vs 2012).

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro 450
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	GF114	Baffin
Release	March 22 2012	October 30 2016
Ranking	#704	#612

Search MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 450 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.