MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon Pro 450

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is positioned at rank #16 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

#6

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

124%

#8

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

112%

#9

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

112%

#13

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

102%

#14

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

101%

#16

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#18

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

99%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro 450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M.

Insight	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro 450
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro 450 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 450 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and Radeon Pro 450

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

Radeon Pro 450

The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M scores 2,637 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro 450
G3D Mark Score	2,637	2,723+3%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9523 TFLOPS	1.024 TFLOPS+8%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	64+60%	40
L1 Cache	512 KB+220%	160 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro 450
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro 450
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro 450
DirectX	11.0	12_0+9%
Max Displays	2	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 450). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 6.3.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro 450
Encoder	PureVideo HD	VCE 3.4
Decoder	VP4	UVD 6.3
Codecs	MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 96.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.