MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs FirePro W4300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is positioned at rank 16 and the FirePro W4300 is on rank 168, so the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

#6

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

124%

#8

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

112%

#9

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

112%

#13

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

102%

#14

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

101%

#16

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#18

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

99%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W4300

#75

Radeon Pro Vega II

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800

99%

#76

Radeon PRO W7900

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500

98%

#77

Radeon Pro VII

MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400

97%

#78

Quadro RTX 5000

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

94%

#79

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

93%

#80

Radeon Pro W6800X

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

90%

#153

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2060%

#168

FirePro W4300

MSRP: $379|Avg: $50

100%

#169

Quadro K2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

100%

#173

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

MSRP: $119|Avg: $86

98%

#175

Radeon Pro 560

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

97%

#176

Radeon Pro 460

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

96%

#180

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

MSRP: $139|Avg: $85

92%

#181

FirePro M5950

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

92%

#183

Radeon Pro WX 7130

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $200

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro W4300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M.

Insight	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	FirePro W4300
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro W4300 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Benchmark Check

FirePro W4300 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and FirePro W4300

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

FirePro W4300

The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M scores 2,637 and the FirePro W4300 reaches 2,719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the FirePro W4300 uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 768 (FirePro W4300). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300).

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	FirePro W4300
G3D Mark Score	2,637	2,719+3%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	768+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9523 TFLOPS	1.428 TFLOPS+50%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	64+33%	48
L1 Cache	512 KB+167%	192 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	FirePro W4300
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W4300 has 4 GB. The FirePro W4300 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 256 KB (FirePro W4300) — the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	FirePro W4300
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 12 (FirePro W4300). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 6.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	FirePro W4300
DirectX	11.0	12+9%
OpenGL	4.2	4.6+10%
Max Displays	2	6+200%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W4300). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W4300).

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	FirePro W4300
Encoder	PureVideo HD	VCE 2.0
Decoder	VP4	UVD 4.2
Codecs	MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the FirePro W4300's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (FirePro W4300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 71°C.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	FirePro W4300
TDP	100W	50W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	171mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	85°C	71°C-16%
Perf/Watt	26.4	54.4+106%