MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Performance Spectrum - GPU

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

100

2,637

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

28

2,715

+3.0%

Arc A530M

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is positioned at rank #16 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

#6

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

124%

#8

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

112%

#9

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

112%

#13

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

102%

#14

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

101%

#16

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#18

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

99%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is significantly newer (2020 vs 2012). The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Benchmark Check

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 80 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,715 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M scores 2,637 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs reaches 2,715 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 80 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs).

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
G3D Mark Score	2,637	2,715+3%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node	40 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	384+380%	80

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has 0 MB. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
DirectX	11.0	12 (12_1)+9%
OpenGL	4.2	4.6+10%
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Decoder: VP4 vs Quick Sync Video (Gen 12). Supported codecs: MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs).

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Encoder	PureVideo HD	Quick Sync Video (Gen 12)
Decoder	VP4	Quick Sync Video (Gen 12)
Codecs	MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs's 28W — a 112.5% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 0W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.