MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs GeForce GTX 950A
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 950A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is positioned at rank 16 and the GeForce GTX 950A is on rank 286, so the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 950A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 950A.
| Insight | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and GeForce GTX 950A
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.
GeForce GTX 950A
The GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,599 points.
Graphics Performance
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M scores 2,637 and the GeForce GTX 950A reaches 2,599 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 950A uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 950A). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950A).
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,637+1% | 2,599 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9523 TFLOPS | 1.439 TFLOPS+51% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+60% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950A) — the GeForce GTX 950A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 950A's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 950A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 75W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.4 | 34.7+31% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 950A is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $159 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $30 |
| Codename | GF114 | GM107 |
| Release | March 22 2012 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #704 | #621 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and GeForce GTX 950A
