MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs GeForce GTX 465

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is positioned at rank #16 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

#6

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

124%

#8

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

112%

#9

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

112%

#13

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

102%

#14

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

101%

#16

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#18

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

99%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce GTX 465
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 465 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 465 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and GeForce GTX 465

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

GeForce GTX 465

The GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,654 points. Launch price was $279.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M scores 2,637 and the GeForce GTX 465 reaches 2,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 465 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 352 (GeForce GTX 465). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 465).

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce GTX 465
G3D Mark Score	2,637	2,654
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Fermi
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384+9%	352
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9523 TFLOPS+11%	0.8554 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64+45%	44
L1 Cache	512 KB	704 KB+38%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce GTX 465
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 465 has 1 GB. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce GTX 465
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 465). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce GTX 465
DirectX	11.0	12 (11_0)+9%
OpenGL	4.2	4.5+7%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs None (GeForce GTX 465). Decoder: VP4 vs VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 465).

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce GTX 465
Encoder	PureVideo HD	None
Decoder	VP4	VP4
Codecs	MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 465's 200W — a 66.7% difference. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce GTX 465
TDP	100W-50%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	—	241mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	85
Perf/Watt	26.4+98%	13.3