MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Quadro K4000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Quadro K4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Quadro K4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 100W vs 80W.

Quadro K4000

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 80W instead of 100W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K4000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.1% in PassMark G3D (2,719 vs 2,637), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K4000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K4000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has the stronger long-term case.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Quadro K4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

Quadro K4000

The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M scores 2,637 and the Quadro K4000 reaches 2,719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro K4000 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 768 (Quadro K4000). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000).

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Quadro K4000
G3D Mark Score	2,637	2,719+3%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	768+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9523 TFLOPS	1.244 TFLOPS+31%
ROPs	32+33%	24
TMUs	64	64
L1 Cache	512 KB+700%	64 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+33%	384 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K4000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Quadro K4000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4000 carries 3 GB. Quadro K4000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and 64-bit on the Quadro K4000. L2 Cache: 512 KB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 384 KB (Quadro K4000) — the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Quadro K4000
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	3 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+33%	384 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the Quadro K4000's 80W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro K4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (Quadro K4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Quadro K4000
TDP	100W	80W-20%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	26.4	34.0+29%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K4000 (2013 vs 2012).

Feature	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M	Quadro K4000
MSRP	—	$1269
Codename	GF114	GK106
Release	March 22 2012	March 1 2013
Ranking	#704	#613

Search MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M on Amazon

Search Quadro K4000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.