MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Quadro K4000
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Popular choices:
Quadro K4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is positioned at rank 16 and the Quadro K4000 is on rank 283, so the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K4000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M.
| Insight | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K4000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and Quadro K4000
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.
Quadro K4000
The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.
Graphics Performance
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M scores 2,637 and the Quadro K4000 reaches 2,719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro K4000 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 768 (Quadro K4000). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000).
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,637 | 2,719+3% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 768+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9523 TFLOPS | 1.244 TFLOPS+31% |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+700% | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4000 has 3 GB. The Quadro K4000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 384 KB (Quadro K4000) — the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 3 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the Quadro K4000's 80W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro K4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (Quadro K4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 80W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.4 | 34.0+29% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K4000 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1269 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $100 |
| Codename | GF114 | GK106 |
| Release | March 22 2012 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #704 | #613 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and Quadro K4000
