
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8770
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is positioned at rank 16 and the Radeon HD 8770 is on rank 271, so the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8770
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8770.
| Insight | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and Radeon HD 8770

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

Radeon HD 8770
The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.
Graphics Performance
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M scores 2,637 and the Radeon HD 8770 reaches 2,607 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8770 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8770). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770).
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,637+1% | 2,607 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9523 TFLOPS+50% | 0.6336 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+433% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 8770) — the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 12_0 (Radeon HD 8770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12_0+9% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon HD 8770). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 4.0.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | VP4 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 8770's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon HD 8770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 240mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.4 | 52.1+97% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8770 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $150 |
| Codename | GF114 | Mars |
| Release | March 22 2012 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #704 | #844 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















