MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon HD 8770

NVIDIA

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012Core: 620 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8770

2013Core: 775 MHzBoost: 825 MHz
Similar parts
·······

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon HD 8770 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon HD 8770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 8770

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (2,637 vs 2,607), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8770 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has the stronger long-term case.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon HD 8770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 8770

The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.

Graphics Performance

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M scores 2,637 and the Radeon HD 8770 reaches 2,607 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8770 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8770). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770).

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon HD 8770
G3D Mark Score
2,637+1%
2,607
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9523 TFLOPS+50%
0.6336 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
64+167%
24
L1 Cache
512 KB+433%
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8770 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon HD 8770
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8770. L2 Cache: 512 KB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 8770) — the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon HD 8770
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 12_0 (Radeon HD 8770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon HD 8770
DirectX
11.0
12_0+9%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon HD 8770). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 4.0.

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon HD 8770
Encoder
PureVideo HD
VCE 2.0
Decoder
VP4
UVD 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 8770's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon HD 8770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon HD 8770
TDP
100W
50W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
240mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
26.4
52.1+97%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 8770 (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureMONSTER GeForce GTX 675MRadeon HD 8770
MSRP
$150
Codename
GF114
Mars
Release
March 22 2012
April 1 2013
Ranking
#704
#844

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.