
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

Radeon HD 8770
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon HD 8770 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon HD 8770 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon HD 8770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Radeon HD 8770
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon HD 8770 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

Radeon HD 8770
The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.
Graphics Performance
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M scores 2,637 and the Radeon HD 8770 reaches 2,607 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8770 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8770). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770).
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,637+1% | 2,607 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9523 TFLOPS+50% | 0.6336 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+433% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8770 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8770. L2 Cache: 512 KB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 8770) — the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 12_0 (Radeon HD 8770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12_0+9% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon HD 8770). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 4.0.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | VP4 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 8770's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon HD 8770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 240mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.4 | 52.1+97% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon HD 8770 (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Codename | GF114 | Mars |
| Release | March 22 2012 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #704 | #844 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















