Quadro 6000 vs Radeon R9 M380

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 6000 vs Radeon R9 M380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 6000 vs Radeon R9 M380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 6000

2010

Why buy it

✅122.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1366.3% HIGHER MSRP
$4,399 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌172% higher power demand at 204W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M380

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,099 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1399% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 204W, a 129W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 122.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 M380 instead at 2,752 vs 2,692, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 6000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M380 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,099 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $4,399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1399% (9.2 vs 0.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M380 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 6000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 6000 vs Radeon R9 M380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 6000

The Quadro 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 10 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $4,399.

Radeon R9 M380

The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 6000 scores 2,692 and the Radeon R9 M380 reaches 2,752 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 6000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R9 M380 uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (Quadro 6000) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M380). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Quadro 6000) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380).

Feature	Quadro 6000	Radeon R9 M380
G3D Mark Score	2,692	2,752+2%
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	448	768+71%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.028 TFLOPS	1.536 TFLOPS+49%
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	56+17%	48
L1 Cache	896 KB+367%	192 KB
L2 Cache	768 KB+200%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 6000	Radeon R9 M380
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 6000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M380 carries 4 GB. Quadro 6000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 6000 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M380. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Quadro 6000) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M380) — the Quadro 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 6000	Radeon R9 M380
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	768 KB+200%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 6000 draws 204W versus the Radeon R9 M380's 75W — a 92.5% difference. The Radeon R9 M380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 6000) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro 6000	Radeon R9 M380
TDP	204W	75W-63%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	85
Perf/Watt	13.2	36.7+178%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 6000 came in at $4399, while the Radeon R9 M380 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M380 was 93.2% cheaper ($4099 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (Quadro 6000) vs 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) — the Radeon R9 M380 offers 1433.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M380 (2015 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro 6000	Radeon R9 M380
MSRP	$4399	$300-93%
Performance per Dollar	0.6	9.2+1433%
Codename	GF100	Strato
Release	December 10 2010	May 5 2015
Ranking	#615	#607

Search Quadro 6000 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M380 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.