Quadro 6000 vs Radeon RX 550

CPU

GPU

Quadro 6000

2010Core: 574 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon RX 550

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Quadro 6000 vs Radeon RX 550 Performance Spectrum

Quadro 6000

6 GB 204

2,692

+0.7%

GeForce 845M

GeForce GTX 580M SLI

GeForce GTX 670MX SLI

GeForce MX250

GeForce GTX 980M

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 2070

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Radeon RX 550

4 GB 50

2,674

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 6000 vs Radeon RX 550 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 6000 vs Radeon RX 550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 6000

2010

Why buy it

✅99.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌2010 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
5468.4% HIGHER MSRP
$4,399 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 33.8 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
❌308% higher power demand at 204W vs 50W.

Radeon RX 550

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,320 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 5431.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅Quadro 6000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 550 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 204W, a 154W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 99.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (2,692 vs 2,674), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 550 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while Quadro 6000 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 550 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,320 cheaper on MSRP at $79 vs $4,399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 5431.1% (33.8 vs 0.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro 6000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro 6000 vs Radeon RX 550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 6000

The Quadro 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 10 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $4,399.

Radeon RX 550

The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 6000 scores 2,692 and the Radeon RX 550 reaches 2,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 6000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon RX 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 448 (Quadro 6000) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Quadro 6000) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550).

Feature	Quadro 6000	Radeon RX 550
G3D Mark Score	2,692	2,674
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	448	512+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.028 TFLOPS	1.211 TFLOPS+18%
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	56+75%	32
L1 Cache	896 KB+600%	128 KB
L2 Cache	768 KB+50%	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro 6000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Quadro 6000	Radeon RX 550
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 6000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 550 carries 4 GB. Quadro 6000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 6000 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 550. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Quadro 6000) vs 512 KB (Radeon RX 550) — the Quadro 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 6000	Radeon RX 550
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	768 KB+50%	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 6000 draws 204W versus the Radeon RX 550's 50W — a 121.3% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 6000) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro 6000	Radeon RX 550
TDP	204W	50W-75%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	155mm
Slots	—	2
Perf/Watt	13.2	53.5+305%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 6000 came in at $4399, while the Radeon RX 550 launched at $79. On MSRP, Radeon RX 550 was 98.2% cheaper ($4320 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (Quadro 6000) vs 33.8 (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon RX 550 offers 5533.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 550 (2017 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro 6000	Radeon RX 550
MSRP	$4399	$79-98%
Performance per Dollar	0.6	33.8+5533%
Codename	GF100	Lexa
Release	December 10 2010	April 20 2017
Ranking	#615	#617

Search Quadro 6000 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 550 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.