
FirePro W4300

Radeon Pro WX 4150
FirePro W4300 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W4300 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W4300 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W4300
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌26.3% HIGHER MSRP$379 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 4150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.8 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W4300 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W4300
The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4150
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W4300 scores 2,719 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 reaches 2,642 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4300 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W4300) vs 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300) vs 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,719+3% | 2,642 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 896+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.428 TFLOPS | 1.887 TFLOPS+32% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 48 | 56+17% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 224 KB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4300 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4150. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro W4300) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W4300) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Vulkan: 1.2.170 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2.170 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W4300) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W4300) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4150).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W4300 draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4300) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 71°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 171mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 71°C-5% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 54.4+3% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W4300 came in at $379, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 4150 was 20.8% cheaper ($79 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (FirePro W4300) vs 8.8 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 22.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 4150 (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | FirePro W4300 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379 | $300-21% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2 | 8.8+22% |
| Codename | Bonaire | Baffin |
| Release | December 1 2015 | March 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #590 | #620 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















