G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs Radeon RX 550 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs Radeon RX 550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2017

Why buy it

✅45.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
279.7% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 33.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).

Radeon RX 550

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $221 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 284.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅Radeon Pro WX 4150 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 550 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 4150 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 45.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX 550 instead at 2,674 vs 2,642, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 550 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon Pro WX 4150 has no comparable frame-generation support. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 550 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $221 cheaper on MSRP at $79 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 284.3% (33.8 vs 8.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Pro WX 4150 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs Radeon RX 550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro WX 4150

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.

Radeon RX 550

The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 scores 2,642 and the Radeon RX 550 reaches 2,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550). Raw compute: 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550). Boost clocks: 1053 MHz vs 1183 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	Radeon RX 550
G3D Mark Score	2,642	2,674+1%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	896+75%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.887 TFLOPS+56%	1.211 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1053 MHz	1183 MHz+12%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	56+75%	32
L1 Cache	224 KB+75%	128 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	Radeon RX 550
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4150 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 550. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	Radeon RX 550
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 12_0 (Radeon RX 550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	Radeon RX 550
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12_0
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 550).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	Radeon RX 550
Encoder	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)	VCE 3.4
Decoder	UVD 6.3	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 550's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	Radeon RX 550
TDP	50W	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	155mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	52.8	53.5+1%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro WX 4150 came in at $300, while the Radeon RX 550 launched at $79. On MSRP, Radeon RX 550 was 73.7% cheaper ($221 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.8 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 33.8 (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon RX 550 offers 284.1% better value.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	Radeon RX 550
MSRP	$300	$79-74%
Performance per Dollar	8.8	33.8+284%
Codename	Baffin	Lexa
Release	March 1 2017	April 20 2017
Ranking	#620	#617

Search Radeon Pro WX 4150 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 550 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.