
Radeon Pro 450

Radeon Pro WX 4150
Radeon Pro 450 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro 450 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro 450 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro 450
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 50W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 4150 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 4150
2017Why buy it
- ✅26.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 50W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro 450 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro 450
The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4150
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 450 scores 2,723 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 reaches 2,642 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 450 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450) vs 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,723+3% | 2,642 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 896+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS | 1.887 TFLOPS+84% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 56+40% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 224 KB+40% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 450 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 4150 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 450 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4150.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 (12_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 450) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 450 draws 35W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 50W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 450) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-30% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 77.8+47% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro 450 came in at $0, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 450 was 100+% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro 450) vs 8.8 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon Pro 450 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 4150 (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 8.8 |
| Codename | Baffin | Baffin |
| Release | October 30 2016 | March 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #612 | #620 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















