
Radeon Pro 450
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 4150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 450
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 50W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 4150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 50W vs 35W.
Radeon Pro 450
2016Radeon Pro WX 4150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 50W, a 15W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 50W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 450 better than Radeon Pro WX 4150?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro WX 4150 make more sense than Radeon Pro 450?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 18 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 21 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 30 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 450 and Radeon Pro WX 4150

Radeon Pro 450
Radeon Pro 450
The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4150
Radeon Pro WX 4150
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 450 scores 2,723 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 reaches 2,642 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 450 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450) vs 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,723+3% | 2,642 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 896+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS | 1.887 TFLOPS+84% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 56+40% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 224 KB+40% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 450 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 (12_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 450) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 450 draws 35W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 50W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 450) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-30% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 77.8+47% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300. The Radeon Pro 450 costs 100+% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro 450) vs 8.8 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon Pro 450 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 8.8 |
| Codename | Baffin | Baffin |
| Release | October 30 2016 | March 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #612 | #620 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













