GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon Pro 450

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon Pro 450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon Pro 450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560

2011

Why buy it

✅51.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro 450

2016

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 560 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 560 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 51.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (2,768 vs 2,723), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 560 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 560 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon Pro 450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560

The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon Pro 450

The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 scores 2,768 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 560) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Radeon Pro 450
G3D Mark Score	2,768+2%	2,723
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	336	640+90%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.089 TFLOPS+6%	1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+40%	40
L1 Cache	448 KB+180%	160 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 450 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Radeon Pro 450
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 450 carries 2 GB. Radeon Pro 450 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 450. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 560) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Radeon Pro 450
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	2 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 124.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Radeon Pro 450
TDP	150W	35W-77%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	18.5	77.8+321%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 came in at $199, while the Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 450 was 100+% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.9 (GeForce GTX 560) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 450 (2016 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Radeon Pro 450
MSRP	$199	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	13.9	Infinity
Codename	GF114	Baffin
Release	May 17 2011	October 30 2016
Ranking	#605	#612

Search GeForce GTX 560 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 450 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.