GeForce GTX 560
VS
Radeon Pro 450

GeForce GTX 560 vs Radeon Pro 450

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560

2011Core: 810 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 450

2016Core: 800 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 560 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro 450 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 560Radeon Pro 450
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 560 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $40), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 35.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 560Radeon Pro 450
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+35.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 and Radeon Pro 450

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560

The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.

AMD

Radeon Pro 450

The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 scores 2,768 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 560) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560Radeon Pro 450
G3D Mark Score
2,768+2%
2,723
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
336
640+90%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.089 TFLOPS+6%
1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
56+40%
40
L1 Cache
448 KB+180%
160 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 560Radeon Pro 450
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 450 has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro 450 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 560) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560Radeon Pro 450
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 124.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560Radeon Pro 450
TDP
150W
35W-77%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
18.5
77.8+321%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 560 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0 and now averages $40. The GeForce GTX 560 costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 92.3 (GeForce GTX 560) vs 68.1 (Radeon Pro 450) — the GeForce GTX 560 offers 35.5% better value. The Radeon Pro 450 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560Radeon Pro 450
MSRP
$199
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$30-25%
$40
Performance per Dollar
92.3+36%
68.1
Codename
GF114
Baffin
Release
May 17 2011
October 30 2016
Ranking
#605
#612