Quadro K4000 vs Radeon Pro 450

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K4000 vs Radeon Pro 450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K4000 vs Radeon Pro 450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K4000

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 450 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro 450

2016

Why buy it

✅9.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro 450 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (2,723 vs 2,719), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K4000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 3 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K4000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon Pro 450 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro K4000 vs Radeon Pro 450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K4000

The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.

Radeon Pro 450

The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K4000 scores 2,719 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro K4000) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).

Feature	Quadro K4000	Radeon Pro 450
G3D Mark Score	2,719	2,723
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	768+20%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.244 TFLOPS+21%	1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	64+60%	40
L1 Cache	64 KB	160 KB+150%
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	1 MB+163%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K4000	Radeon Pro 450
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K4000 has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 450 carries 2 GB. Quadro K4000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K4000 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 450. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (Quadro K4000) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K4000	Radeon Pro 450
VRAM Capacity	3 GB+50%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	1 MB+163%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K4000 draws 80W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 78.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K4000	Radeon Pro 450
TDP	80W	35W-56%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	34.0	77.8+129%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K4000 came in at $1269, while the Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 450 was 100+% cheaper ($1269 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (Quadro K4000) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 450 (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro K4000	Radeon Pro 450
MSRP	$1269	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	2.1	Infinity
Codename	GK106	Baffin
Release	March 1 2013	October 30 2016
Ranking	#613	#612

Search Quadro K4000 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 450 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.