Quadro K4000 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

NVIDIA

Quadro K4000

2013Core: 810 MHz
Similar parts
Β·
VS
NVIDIA

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

2025Core: 1590 MHzBoost: 2617 MHz
Similar parts
Β·

Quadro K4000 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K4000 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K4000 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K4000

2013

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $7,296 less on MSRP ($1,269 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 568.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($1,269 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
  • βœ…50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
  • βœ…Draws 80W instead of 600W, a 520W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

2025

Why buy it

  • βœ…136.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • βœ…Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025βˆ’2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • βœ…More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025βˆ’2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌
    574.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $8,565 MSRPvs$1,269 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).
  • ❌650% higher power demand at 600W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 136.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1% in PassMark G3D (2,747 vs 2,719), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 188 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K4000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $7,296 cheaper on MSRP at $1,269 vs $8,565, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 568.1% (2.1 vs 0.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K4000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K4000 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro K4000

The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.

NVIDIA

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1590 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $8,565.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K4000 scores 2,719 and the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q reaches 2,747 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4000 is built on Kepler while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro K4000) vs 24,064 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000) vs 126 TFLOPS (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q).

FeatureQuadro K4000RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
G3D Mark Score
2,719
2,747+1%
Architecture
Kepler
Blackwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
768
24064+3033%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.244 TFLOPS
126 TFLOPS+10029%
ROPs
24
192+700%
TMUs
64
752+1075%
L1 Cache
0.06 MB
23.5 MB+39067%
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
128 MB+33584%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K4000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureQuadro K4000RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K4000 has 3 GB of VRAM, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q carries 2 GB. Quadro K4000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K4000 and 512-bit on the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (Quadro K4000) vs 128 MB (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) β€” the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro K4000RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
VRAM Capacity
3 GB+50%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR7
Bus Width
64-bit
512-bit+700%
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
128 MB+33584%
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K4000 draws 80W versus the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q's 600W β€” a 152.9% difference. The Quadro K4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4000) vs 350W (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro K4000RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
TDP
80W-87%
600W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
β€”
304mm
Height
β€”
137mm
Slots
β€”
2
Perf/Watt
34.0+639%
4.6
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K4000 came in at $1269, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q launched at $8565. On MSRP, Quadro K4000 was 85.2% cheaper ($7296 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (Quadro K4000) vs 0.3 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) β€” the Quadro K4000 offers 600% better value. The newer card here is RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q (2025 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro K4000RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
MSRP
$1269-85%
$8565
Performance per Dollar
2.1+600%
0.3
Codename
GK106
GB202
Release
March 1 2013
March 18 2025
Ranking
#613
#609

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.