GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs Quadro K4000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 770M SLI

2013Core: 811 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K4000

2013Core: 810 MHz
Similar parts
·

GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs Quadro K4000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs Quadro K4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs Quadro K4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 770M SLI

2013

Why buy it

  • 36.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).
  • 87.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 80W.

Quadro K4000

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 80W instead of 150W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 770M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 770M SLI is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 36.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.1% in PassMark G3D (2,803 vs 2,719), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 770M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K4000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K4000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 770M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs Quadro K4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 770M SLI

The GeForce GTX 770M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 811 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,803 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K4000

The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 770M SLI scores 2,803 and the Quadro K4000 reaches 2,719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 770M SLI is built on Kepler while the Quadro K4000 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce GTX 770M SLI) vs 768 (Quadro K4000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 770M SLIQuadro K4000
G3D Mark Score
2,803+3%
2,719
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1920+150%
768

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 770M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K4000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 770M SLIQuadro K4000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 770M SLI has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4000 carries 3 GB. Quadro K4000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 770M SLI and 64-bit on the Quadro K4000.

FeatureGeForce GTX 770M SLIQuadro K4000
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
3 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 770M SLI draws 150W versus the Quadro K4000's 80W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro K4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 770M SLI) vs 350W (Quadro K4000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 770M SLIQuadro K4000
TDP
150W
80W-47%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
18.7
34.0+82%