
GeForce GTX 770M SLI
Popular choices:

Quadro K4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 770M SLI
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 80W.
Quadro K4000
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 150W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 770M SLI
2013Quadro K4000
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 150W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 770M SLI better than Quadro K4000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro K4000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 770M SLI | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 770M SLI | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 20 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 18 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 770M SLI | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 31 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 770M SLI | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 17 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 770M SLI and Quadro K4000

GeForce GTX 770M SLI
GeForce GTX 770M SLI
The GeForce GTX 770M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 811 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,803 points.

Quadro K4000
Quadro K4000
The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 770M SLI scores 2,803 and the Quadro K4000 reaches 2,719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 770M SLI is built on Kepler while the Quadro K4000 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce GTX 770M SLI) vs 768 (Quadro K4000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M SLI | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,803+3% | 2,719 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+150% | 768 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 770M SLI gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K4000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M SLI | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 770M SLI comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4000 has 3 GB. The Quadro K4000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M SLI | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 3 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 770M SLI draws 150W versus the Quadro K4000's 80W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro K4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 770M SLI) vs 350W (Quadro K4000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M SLI | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 80W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 18.7 | 34.0+82% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












