GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs Quadro K4100M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs Quadro K4100M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs Quadro K4100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 770M SLI

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K4100M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Quadro K4100M

2013

Why buy it

✅11.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K4100M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 770M SLI instead at 2,803 vs 2,773, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 770M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K4100M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K4100M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 770M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs Quadro K4100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 770M SLI

The GeForce GTX 770M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 811 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,803 points.

Quadro K4100M

The Quadro K4100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,773 points. Launch price was $1,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 770M SLI scores 2,803 and the Quadro K4100M reaches 2,773 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 770M SLI is built on Kepler while the Quadro K4100M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce GTX 770M SLI) vs 1,152 (Quadro K4100M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 770M SLI	Quadro K4100M
G3D Mark Score	2,803+1%	2,773
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1920+67%	1152

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 770M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K4100M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 770M SLI	Quadro K4100M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 770M SLI has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4100M carries 4 GB. Quadro K4100M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 770M SLI and 64-bit on the Quadro K4100M.

Feature	GeForce GTX 770M SLI	Quadro K4100M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 770M SLI draws 150W versus the Quadro K4100M's 100W — a 40% difference. The Quadro K4100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 770M SLI) vs 350W (Quadro K4100M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.