Quadro K4000 vs Quadro K4100M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K4000 vs Quadro K4100M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K4000 vs Quadro K4100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K4000

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($1,269 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 15.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($1,269 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 80W instead of 100W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K4100M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K4100M

2013

Why buy it

✅51.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
18.1% HIGHER MSRP
$1,499 MSRPvs$1,269 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 100W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K4100M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 51.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2% in PassMark G3D (2,773 vs 2,719), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K4000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K4000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $230 cheaper on MSRP at $1,269 vs $1,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 15.8% (2.1 vs 1.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro K4100M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro K4000 vs Quadro K4100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K4000

The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.

Quadro K4100M

The Quadro K4100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,773 points. Launch price was $1,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K4000 scores 2,719 and the Quadro K4100M reaches 2,773 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4000 is built on Kepler while the Quadro K4100M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Quadro K4000) vs 1,152 (Quadro K4100M). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000) vs 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro K4100M).

Feature	Quadro K4000	Quadro K4100M
G3D Mark Score	2,719	2,773+2%
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	1152+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.244 TFLOPS	1.627 TFLOPS+31%
ROPs	24	32+33%
TMUs	64	96+50%
L1 Cache	64 KB	96 KB+50%
L2 Cache	384 KB	512 KB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K4000	Quadro K4100M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K4000 has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4100M carries 4 GB. Quadro K4100M gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K4000 and 64-bit on the Quadro K4100M. L2 Cache: 384 KB (Quadro K4000) vs 512 KB (Quadro K4100M) — the Quadro K4100M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K4000	Quadro K4100M
VRAM Capacity	3 GB	4 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	384 KB	512 KB+33%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K4000 draws 80W versus the Quadro K4100M's 100W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro K4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4000) vs 350W (Quadro K4100M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K4000	Quadro K4100M
TDP	80W-20%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	34.0+23%	27.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K4000 came in at $1269, while the Quadro K4100M launched at $1499. On MSRP, Quadro K4000 was 15.3% cheaper ($230 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (Quadro K4000) vs 1.8 (Quadro K4100M) — the Quadro K4000 offers 16.7% better value.

Feature	Quadro K4000	Quadro K4100M
MSRP	$1269-15%	$1499
Performance per Dollar	2.1+17%	1.8
Codename	GK106	GK104
Release	March 1 2013	July 23 2013
Ranking	#613	#604

Search Quadro K4000 on Amazon

Search Quadro K4100M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.