Quadro K4000 vs Radeon R9 M380

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K4000 vs Radeon R9 M380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K4000 vs Radeon R9 M380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K4000

2013

Why buy it

✅16.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
323% HIGHER MSRP
$1,269 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($1,269 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M380

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $969 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).
✅Delivers 328.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K4000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 16.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 M380 instead at 2,752 vs 2,719, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K4000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M380 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $969 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $1,269, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 328.1% (9.2 vs 2.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M380 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K4000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K4000 vs Radeon R9 M380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K4000

The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.

Radeon R9 M380

The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K4000 scores 2,719 and the Radeon R9 M380 reaches 2,752 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M380 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Quadro K4000) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M380). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380).

Feature	Quadro K4000	Radeon R9 M380
G3D Mark Score	2,719	2,752+1%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.244 TFLOPS	1.536 TFLOPS+23%
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	64+33%	48
L1 Cache	64 KB	192 KB+200%
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K4000	Radeon R9 M380
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K4000 has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M380 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M380 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K4000 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M380. L2 Cache: 384 KB (Quadro K4000) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M380) — the Quadro K4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K4000	Radeon R9 M380
VRAM Capacity	3 GB	4 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K4000 draws 80W versus the Radeon R9 M380's 75W — a 6.5% difference. The Radeon R9 M380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4000) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro K4000	Radeon R9 M380
TDP	80W	75W-6%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	85
Perf/Watt	34.0	36.7+8%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K4000 came in at $1269, while the Radeon R9 M380 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M380 was 76.4% cheaper ($969 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (Quadro K4000) vs 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) — the Radeon R9 M380 offers 338.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M380 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro K4000	Radeon R9 M380
MSRP	$1269	$300-76%
Performance per Dollar	2.1	9.2+338%
Codename	GK106	Strato
Release	March 1 2013	May 5 2015
Ranking	#613	#607

Search Quadro K4000 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M380 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.