
GeForce GTX 770M SLI
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 770M SLI
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.
Radeon Pro 450
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 770M SLI
2013Radeon Pro 450
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 770M SLI better than Radeon Pro 450?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 450 make more sense than GeForce GTX 770M SLI?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 770M SLI | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 770M SLI | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 20 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 18 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 770M SLI | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 31 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 770M SLI | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 770M SLI and Radeon Pro 450

GeForce GTX 770M SLI
GeForce GTX 770M SLI
The GeForce GTX 770M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 811 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,803 points.

Radeon Pro 450
Radeon Pro 450
The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 770M SLI scores 2,803 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 770M SLI is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce GTX 770M SLI) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M SLI | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,803+3% | 2,723 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+200% | 640 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 770M SLI gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 450 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M SLI | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M SLI | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 770M SLI draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 124.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 770M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M SLI | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 35W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 18.7 | 77.8+316% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 450 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M SLI | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | — | Baffin |
| Release | May 30 2013 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #430 | #612 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












