
Quadro K5000M

Radeon Pro 450
Quadro K5000M vs Radeon Pro 450 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro K5000M vs Radeon Pro 450 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro K5000M vs Radeon Pro 450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro K5000M
2012Why buy it
- ✅41.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 35W.
Radeon Pro 450
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 100W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K5000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K5000M vs Radeon Pro 450 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K5000M
The Quadro K5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,805 points. Launch price was $329.99.

Radeon Pro 450
The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K5000M scores 2,805 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5000M is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (Quadro K5000M) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 1.615 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000M) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).
| Feature | Quadro K5000M | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,805+3% | 2,723 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344+110% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.615 TFLOPS+58% | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+180% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 160 KB+43% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K5000M | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K5000M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 450 carries 2 GB. Quadro K5000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K5000M and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 450. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K5000M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K5000M | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K5000M) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro K5000M | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (Quadro K5000M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 450). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | Quadro K5000M | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K5000M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 96.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5000M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K5000M | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 35W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 81°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 28.1 | 77.8+177% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon Pro 450 (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | Quadro K5000M | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | GK104 | Baffin |
| Release | August 7 2012 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #600 | #612 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














