Quadro K5000M vs Radeon Pro 450

NVIDIA

Quadro K5000M

2012Core: 601 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 450

2016Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro K5000M vs Radeon Pro 450 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K5000M vs Radeon Pro 450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K5000M vs Radeon Pro 450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K5000M

2012

Why buy it

  • 41.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 185.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro 450

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 100W, a 65W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro K5000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K5000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 41.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3% in PassMark G3D (2,805 vs 2,723), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K5000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K5000M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro K5000M vs Radeon Pro 450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro K5000M

The Quadro K5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,805 points. Launch price was $329.99.

AMD

Radeon Pro 450

The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5000M scores 2,805 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5000M is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (Quadro K5000M) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 1.615 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000M) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).

FeatureQuadro K5000MRadeon Pro 450
G3D Mark Score
2,805+3%
2,723
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1344+110%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.615 TFLOPS+58%
1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
112+180%
40
L1 Cache
112 KB
160 KB+43%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K5000MRadeon Pro 450
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K5000M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 450 carries 2 GB. Quadro K5000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K5000M and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 450. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K5000M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro K5000MRadeon Pro 450
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K5000M) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureQuadro K5000MRadeon Pro 450
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12_0
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (Quadro K5000M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 450). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 6.3.

FeatureQuadro K5000MRadeon Pro 450
Encoder
1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)
VCE 3.4
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5000M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 96.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5000M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro K5000MRadeon Pro 450
TDP
100W
35W-65%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
81°C
Perf/Watt
28.1
77.8+177%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro 450 (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureQuadro K5000MRadeon Pro 450
MSRP
$0
Codename
GK104
Baffin
Release
August 7 2012
October 30 2016
Ranking
#600
#612

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.