
Quadro K5000M

Radeon HD 6970
Quadro K5000M vs Radeon HD 6970 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro K5000M vs Radeon HD 6970 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro K5000M vs Radeon HD 6970: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro K5000M
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6970 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $369 MSRP).
Radeon HD 6970
2010Why buy it
- ✅7.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($369 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K5000M vs Radeon HD 6970 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K5000M
The Quadro K5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,805 points. Launch price was $329.99.

Radeon HD 6970
The Radeon HD 6970 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,831 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K5000M scores 2,805 and the Radeon HD 6970 reaches 2,831 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5000M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6970 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (Quadro K5000M) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6970). Raw compute: 1.615 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000M) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6970).
| Feature | Quadro K5000M | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,805 | 2,831 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344 | 1536+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.615 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+67% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+17% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 192 KB+71% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K5000M | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K5000M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6970 carries 2 GB. Quadro K5000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K5000M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6970.
| Feature | Quadro K5000M | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K5000M) vs 11.0 (Radeon HD 6970). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro K5000M | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.5+2% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (Quadro K5000M) vs None (Radeon HD 6970). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K5000M) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon HD 6970).
| Feature | Quadro K5000M | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K5000M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 6970's 250W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro K5000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5000M) vs 550W (Radeon HD 6970). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 81°C vs 90.
| Feature | Quadro K5000M | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-60% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | — | 286mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 81°C-10% | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 28.1+149% | 11.3 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Quadro K5000M (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro K5000M | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $369 |
| Codename | GK104 | Cayman |
| Release | August 7 2012 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #600 | #596 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














