GRID K280Q vs Quadro K5000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K280Q vs Quadro K5000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K280Q vs Quadro K5000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K280Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.

Quadro K5000M

2012

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K280Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (2,840 vs 2,805), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K280Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2013 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID K280Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GRID K280Q vs Quadro K5000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K280Q

The GRID K280Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,840 points. Launch price was $1,875.

Quadro K5000M

The Quadro K5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,805 points. Launch price was $329.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K280Q scores 2,840 and the Quadro K5000M reaches 2,805 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K280Q is built on Kepler while the Quadro K5000M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K280Q) vs 1,344 (Quadro K5000M). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K280Q) vs 1.615 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000M).

Feature	GRID K280Q	Quadro K5000M
G3D Mark Score	2,840+1%	2,805
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+14%	1344
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+42%	1.615 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+14%	112
L1 Cache	128 KB+14%	112 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K280Q	Quadro K5000M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K280Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5000M carries 4 GB. Quadro K5000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K280Q and 64-bit on the Quadro K5000M.

Feature	GRID K280Q	Quadro K5000M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K280Q) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K5000M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	GRID K280Q	Quadro K5000M
DirectX	11_0	12 (11_0)+9%
Max Displays	0	4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K280Q draws 225W versus the Quadro K5000M's 100W — a 76.9% difference. The Quadro K5000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K280Q) vs 350W (Quadro K5000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID K280Q	Quadro K5000M
TDP	225W	100W-56%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	—	81°C
Perf/Watt	12.6	28.1+123%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GRID K280Q (2013 vs 2012).

Feature	GRID K280Q	Quadro K5000M
MSRP	$2000	—
Codename	GK104	GK104
Release	June 28 2013	August 7 2012
Ranking	#595	#600

Search GRID K280Q on Amazon

Search Quadro K5000M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.