GRID K280Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4170

GRID K280Q

2013Core: 745 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4170

2016Core: 1125 MHzBoost: 1201 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID K280Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4170 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K280Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4170: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K280Q

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 400% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,000 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
  • 350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro WX 4170

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,600 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 405.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro WX 4170 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (2,870 vs 2,840), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID K280Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 4170 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,600 cheaper on MSRP at $400 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 405.3% (7.2 vs 1.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 4170 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID K280Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K280Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4170 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID K280Q

The GRID K280Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,840 points. Launch price was $1,875.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4170

The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,870 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

The GRID K280Q scores 2,840 and the Radeon Pro WX 4170 reaches 2,870 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K280Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro WX 4170 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K280Q) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4170). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K280Q) vs 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4170).

FeatureGRID K280QRadeon Pro WX 4170
G3D Mark Score
2,840
2,870+1%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1536+50%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.289 TFLOPS
2.46 TFLOPS+7%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+100%
64
L1 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID K280QRadeon Pro WX 4170
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K280Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4170 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 4170 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K280Q and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4170. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K280Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4170) — the Radeon Pro WX 4170 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID K280QRadeon Pro WX 4170
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K280Q) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4170). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureGRID K280QRadeon Pro WX 4170
DirectX
11_0
12 (12_0)+9%
Max Displays
0
4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K280Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4170's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K280Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4170). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID K280QRadeon Pro WX 4170
TDP
225W
50W-78%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
12.6
57.4+356%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K280Q came in at $2000, while the Radeon Pro WX 4170 launched at $400. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 4170 was 80% cheaper ($1600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GRID K280Q) vs 7.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4170) — the Radeon Pro WX 4170 offers 414.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 4170 (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureGRID K280QRadeon Pro WX 4170
MSRP
$2000
$400-80%
Performance per Dollar
1.4
7.2+414%
Codename
GK104
Baffin
Release
June 28 2013
November 10 2016
Ranking
#595
#526

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.