GRID K280Q
Quadro K1200
GRID K280Q vs Quadro K1200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID K280Q vs Quadro K1200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GRID K280Q vs Quadro K1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID K280Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌566.7% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 225W vs 45W.
Quadro K1200
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 596% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 225W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID K280Q vs Quadro K1200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GRID K280Q
The GRID K280Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,840 points. Launch price was $1,875.
Quadro K1200
The Quadro K1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 28 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,965 points. Launch price was $321.97.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K280Q scores 2,840 and the Quadro K1200 reaches 2,965 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K280Q is built on Kepler while the Quadro K1200 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K280Q) vs 512 (Quadro K1200). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K280Q) vs 1.0578 TFLOPS (Quadro K1200).
| Feature | GRID K280Q | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,840 | 2,965+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+200% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS+116% | 1.0578 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K280Q | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID K280Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K1200 carries 4 GB. Quadro K1200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K280Q and 64-bit on the Quadro K1200. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K280Q) vs 2 MB (Quadro K1200) — the Quadro K1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID K280Q | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K280Q draws 225W versus the Quadro K1200's 45W — a 133.3% difference. The Quadro K1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K280Q) vs 350W (Quadro K1200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID K280Q | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 45W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.6 | 65.9+423% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID K280Q came in at $2000, while the Quadro K1200 launched at $300. On MSRP, Quadro K1200 was 85% cheaper ($1700 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GRID K280Q) vs 9.9 (Quadro K1200) — the Quadro K1200 offers 607.1% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K1200 (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID K280Q | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $300-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | 9.9+607% |
| Codename | GK104 | GM107 |
| Release | June 28 2013 | January 28 2015 |
| Ranking | #595 | #586 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K280Q and Quadro K1200
