
GRID K280Q

Radeon HD 6970
GRID K280Q vs Radeon HD 6970 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID K280Q vs Radeon HD 6970 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID K280Q vs Radeon HD 6970: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID K280Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 286mm, a 285mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌442% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$369 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 7.7 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $369 MSRP).
Radeon HD 6970
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,631 less on MSRP ($369 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 440.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.7 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($369 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌28500% longer card at 286mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID K280Q vs Radeon HD 6970 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K280Q
The GRID K280Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,840 points. Launch price was $1,875.

Radeon HD 6970
The Radeon HD 6970 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,831 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K280Q scores 2,840 and the Radeon HD 6970 reaches 2,831 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K280Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6970 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K280Q) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6970). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K280Q) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6970).
| Feature | GRID K280Q | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,840 | 2,831 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+18% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+33% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K280Q | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K280Q and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6970.
| Feature | GRID K280Q | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K280Q) vs 11.0 (Radeon HD 6970). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.
| Feature | GRID K280Q | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 11.0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 6 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K280Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 6970's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID K280Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K280Q) vs 550W (Radeon HD 6970). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 286mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID K280Q | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-10% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 286mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 12.6+12% | 11.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID K280Q came in at $2000, while the Radeon HD 6970 launched at $369. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6970 was 81.5% cheaper ($1631 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GRID K280Q) vs 7.7 (Radeon HD 6970) — the Radeon HD 6970 offers 450% better value. The newer card here is GRID K280Q (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | GRID K280Q | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $369-82% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | 7.7+450% |
| Codename | GK104 | Cayman |
| Release | June 28 2013 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #595 | #596 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














