GeForce MX350 vs GRID K280Q
GeForce MX350
Popular choices:
GRID K280Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX350 is positioned at rank 348 and the GRID K280Q is on rank 323, so the GRID K280Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX350
Performance Per Dollar GRID K280Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce MX350 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The GeForce MX350 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID K280Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID K280Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX350.
| Insight | GeForce MX350 | GRID K280Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID K280Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $200 for the GeForce MX350, it costs 75% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 301.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce MX350 | GRID K280Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+301.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX350 and GRID K280Q
GeForce MX350
The GeForce MX350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points.
GRID K280Q
The GRID K280Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,840 points. Launch price was $1,875.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX350 scores 2,828 and the GRID K280Q reaches 2,840 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX350 is built on Pascal while the GRID K280Q uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce MX350) vs 1,536 (GRID K280Q). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce MX350) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K280Q).
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | GRID K280Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,828 | 2,840 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1536+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.199 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS+91% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB+88% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | GRID K280Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | GRID K280Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX350 draws 20W versus the GRID K280Q's 225W — a 167.3% difference. The GeForce MX350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX350) vs 350W (GRID K280Q). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | GRID K280Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-91% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 141.4+1022% | 12.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX350 launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the GRID K280Q launched at $2000 and now averages $50. The GRID K280Q costs 75% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.1 (GeForce MX350) vs 56.8 (GRID K280Q) — the GRID K280Q offers 302.8% better value. The GeForce MX350 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | GRID K280Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-88% | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $50-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.1 | 56.8+303% |
| Codename | GP107 | GK104 |
| Release | February 10 2020 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #597 | #595 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX350 and GRID K280Q
