GeForce MX350 vs Radeon HD 6970

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX350 vs Radeon HD 6970 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX350 vs Radeon HD 6970: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX350

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $119 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $369 MSRP).
✅Delivers 47.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.3 vs 7.7 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $369 MSRP).
✅Radeon HD 6970 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX350 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 20W instead of 250W, a 230W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6970 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2020 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon HD 6970

2010

Why buy it

✅57.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
47.6% HIGHER MSRP
$369 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.7 vs 11.3 G3D/$ ($369 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
❌1150% higher power demand at 250W vs 20W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6970 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 57.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (2,831 vs 2,828), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX350 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX350 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $119 cheaper on MSRP at $250 vs $369, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 47.4% (11.3 vs 7.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 6970 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce MX350 vs Radeon HD 6970 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX350

The GeForce MX350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points.

Radeon HD 6970

The Radeon HD 6970 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,831 points. Launch price was $369.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX350 scores 2,828 and the Radeon HD 6970 reaches 2,831 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX350 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 6970 uses TeraScale 3, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce MX350) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6970). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce MX350) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6970). Boost clocks: 937 MHz vs 880 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX350	Radeon HD 6970
G3D Mark Score	2,828	2,831
Architecture	Pascal	TeraScale 3
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	640	1536+140%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.199 TFLOPS	2.703 TFLOPS+125%
Boost Clock	937 MHz+6%	880 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	96+200%
L1 Cache	240 KB+25%	192 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX350 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6970 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce MX350	Radeon HD 6970
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX350 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6970.

Feature	GeForce MX350	Radeon HD 6970
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	56 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX350 draws 20W versus the Radeon HD 6970's 250W — a 170.4% difference. The GeForce MX350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX350) vs 550W (Radeon HD 6970). Power connectors: Mobile vs 6-pin + 8-pin.

Feature	GeForce MX350	Radeon HD 6970
TDP	20W-92%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	Mobile	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	—	286mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	90
Perf/Watt	141.4+1151%	11.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX350 came in at $250, while the Radeon HD 6970 launched at $369. On MSRP, GeForce MX350 was 32.2% cheaper ($119 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.3 (GeForce MX350) vs 7.7 (Radeon HD 6970) — the GeForce MX350 offers 46.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX350 (2020 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce MX350	Radeon HD 6970
MSRP	$250-32%	$369
Performance per Dollar	11.3+47%	7.7
Codename	GP107	Cayman
Release	February 10 2020	December 14 2010
Ranking	#597	#596

Search GeForce MX350 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6970 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.