GeForce MX350 vs Radeon R7 260

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX350 vs Radeon R7 260 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX350 vs Radeon R7 260: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX350

2020

Why buy it

✅20.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Radeon R7 260 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX350 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 20W instead of 95W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2020 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
129.4% HIGHER MSRP
$250 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 26.5 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Radeon R7 260

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $141 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 134.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.5 vs 11.3 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX350 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌375% higher power demand at 95W vs 20W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce MX350 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 20.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 260 instead at 2,892 vs 2,828, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX350 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 260 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $141 cheaper on MSRP at $109 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 134.5% (26.5 vs 11.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 260 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce MX350 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce MX350 vs Radeon R7 260 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX350

The GeForce MX350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points.

Radeon R7 260

The Radeon R7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 17 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX350 scores 2,828 and the Radeon R7 260 reaches 2,892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX350 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R7 260 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce MX350) vs 768 (Radeon R7 260). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce MX350) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260). Boost clocks: 937 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX350	Radeon R7 260
G3D Mark Score	2,828	2,892+2%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	768+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.199 TFLOPS	1.536 TFLOPS+28%
Boost Clock	937 MHz	1100 MHz+17%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	48+50%
L1 Cache	240 KB+25%	192 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX350 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 260 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce MX350	Radeon R7 260
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX350 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 260 carries 1 GB. GeForce MX350 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 56 GB/s (GeForce MX350) vs 96 GB/s (Radeon R7 260) — a 71.4% advantage for the Radeon R7 260. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX350 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 260. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce MX350) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 260) — the GeForce MX350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX350	Radeon R7 260
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	56 GB/s	96 GB/s+71%
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX350 draws 20W versus the Radeon R7 260's 95W — a 130.4% difference. The GeForce MX350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX350) vs 400W (Radeon R7 260). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce MX350	Radeon R7 260
TDP	20W-79%	95W
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	Mobile	1x 6-pin
Length	—	170mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	141.4+365%	30.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX350 came in at $250, while the Radeon R7 260 launched at $109. On MSRP, Radeon R7 260 was 56.4% cheaper ($141 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.3 (GeForce MX350) vs 26.5 (Radeon R7 260) — the Radeon R7 260 offers 134.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX350 (2020 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce MX350	Radeon R7 260
MSRP	$250	$109-56%
Performance per Dollar	11.3	26.5+135%
Codename	GP107	Bonaire
Release	February 10 2020	December 17 2013
Ranking	#597	#591

Search GeForce MX350 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 260 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.