GeForce MX350 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce MX350
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX350 is positioned at rank #348 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX350
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1016.6% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX350.
| Insight | GeForce MX350 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1016.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1016.6%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $200), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 278.5% better value per dollar than the GeForce MX350.
| Insight | GeForce MX350 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+278.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX350 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce MX350
The GeForce MX350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX350 scores 2,828 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 1016.6%. The GeForce MX350 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce MX350) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce MX350) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 937 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,828 | 31,578+1017% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 7680+1100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.199 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+3244% |
| Boost Clock | 937 MHz | 2610 MHz+179% |
| ROPs | 16 | 80+400% |
| TMUs | 32 | 240+650% |
| L1 Cache | 0.23 MB | 7.5 MB+3161% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 48 MB+9500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce MX350 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX350 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 56 GB/s (GeForce MX350) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 800% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce MX350) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 12 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 56 GB/s | 504 GB/s+800% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 48 MB+9500% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX350 draws 20W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 173.8% difference. The GeForce MX350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX350) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-93% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-50% | 700W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 285mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.4+28% | 110.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX350 launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The GeForce MX350 costs 66.1% less ($390 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.1 (GeForce MX350) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 279.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-69% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-66% | $590 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.1 | 53.5+279% |
| Codename | GP107 | AD104 |
| Release | February 10 2020 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #597 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX350 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
