
GeForce MX350

Radeon Pro WX 4170
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon Pro WX 4170 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon Pro WX 4170 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon Pro WX 4170: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce MX350
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 57.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.3 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Radeon Pro WX 4170 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX350 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 50W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 4170 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon Pro WX 4170
2016Why buy it
- ✅41.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌60% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 11.3 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 50W vs 20W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon Pro WX 4170 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX350
The GeForce MX350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4170
The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,870 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX350 scores 2,828 and the Radeon Pro WX 4170 reaches 2,870 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX350 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 4170 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce MX350) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4170). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce MX350) vs 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4170). Boost clocks: 937 MHz vs 1201 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | Radeon Pro WX 4170 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,828 | 2,870+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1024+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.199 TFLOPS | 2.46 TFLOPS+105% |
| Boost Clock | 937 MHz | 1201 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 256 KB+7% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX350 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 4170 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | Radeon Pro WX 4170 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX350 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4170 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 4170 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX350 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4170. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce MX350) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4170) — the Radeon Pro WX 4170 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | Radeon Pro WX 4170 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX350 draws 20W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4170's 50W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce MX350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX350) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4170). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | Radeon Pro WX 4170 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-60% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.4+146% | 57.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce MX350 came in at $250, while the Radeon Pro WX 4170 launched at $400. On MSRP, GeForce MX350 was 37.5% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.3 (GeForce MX350) vs 7.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4170) — the GeForce MX350 offers 56.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX350 (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | Radeon Pro WX 4170 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-38% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.3+57% | 7.2 |
| Codename | GP107 | Baffin |
| Release | February 10 2020 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #597 | #526 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














