GeForce MX350 vs GRID K260Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX350 vs GRID K260Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX350 vs GRID K260Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX350

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $687 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $937 MSRP).
✅Delivers 259.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.3 vs 3.1 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $937 MSRP).
✅GRID K260Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX350 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 20W instead of 225W, a 205W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2020 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

GRID K260Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
274.8% HIGHER MSRP
$937 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.1 vs 11.3 G3D/$ ($937 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
❌1025% higher power demand at 225W vs 20W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K260Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.3% in PassMark G3D (2,949 vs 2,828), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX350 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX350 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $687 cheaper on MSRP at $250 vs $937, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 259.4% (11.3 vs 3.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID K260Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce MX350 vs GRID K260Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX350

The GeForce MX350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points.

GRID K260Q

The GRID K260Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,949 points. Launch price was $937.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX350 scores 2,828 and the GRID K260Q reaches 2,949 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX350 is built on Pascal while the GRID K260Q uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce MX350) vs 1,536 (GRID K260Q). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce MX350) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K260Q).

Feature	GeForce MX350	GRID K260Q
G3D Mark Score	2,828	2,949+4%
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	1536+140%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.199 TFLOPS	2.289 TFLOPS+91%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	128+300%
L1 Cache	240 KB+88%	128 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX350 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K260Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce MX350	GRID K260Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX350 and 64-bit on the GRID K260Q.

Feature	GeForce MX350	GRID K260Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX350 draws 20W versus the GRID K260Q's 225W — a 167.3% difference. The GeForce MX350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX350) vs 350W (GRID K260Q). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce MX350	GRID K260Q
TDP	20W-91%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	141.4+979%	13.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX350 came in at $250, while the GRID K260Q launched at $937. On MSRP, GeForce MX350 was 73.3% cheaper ($687 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.3 (GeForce MX350) vs 3.1 (GRID K260Q) — the GeForce MX350 offers 264.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX350 (2020 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce MX350	GRID K260Q
MSRP	$250-73%	$937
Performance per Dollar	11.3+265%	3.1
Codename	GP107	GK104
Release	February 10 2020	June 28 2013
Ranking	#597	#589

Search GeForce MX350 on Amazon

Search GRID K260Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.