GeForce MX350 vs Quadro K4100M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX350 vs Quadro K4100M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX350 vs Quadro K4100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX350

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,249 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 511.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.3 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Quadro K4100M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX350 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 20W instead of 100W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K4100M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2020 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quadro K4100M

2013

Why buy it

✅43.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
499.6% HIGHER MSRP
$1,499 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 11.3 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 100W vs 20W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K4100M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 43.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce MX350 instead at 2,828 vs 2,773, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX350 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX350 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,249 cheaper on MSRP at $250 vs $1,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 511.5% (11.3 vs 1.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro K4100M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce MX350 vs Quadro K4100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX350

The GeForce MX350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points.

Quadro K4100M

The Quadro K4100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,773 points. Launch price was $1,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX350 scores 2,828 and the Quadro K4100M reaches 2,773 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX350 is built on Pascal while the Quadro K4100M uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce MX350) vs 1,152 (Quadro K4100M). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce MX350) vs 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro K4100M).

Feature	GeForce MX350	Quadro K4100M
G3D Mark Score	2,828+2%	2,773
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	1152+80%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.199 TFLOPS	1.627 TFLOPS+36%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	96+200%
L1 Cache	240 KB+150%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX350 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K4100M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce MX350	Quadro K4100M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX350 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4100M carries 4 GB. Quadro K4100M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX350 and 64-bit on the Quadro K4100M.

Feature	GeForce MX350	Quadro K4100M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX350 draws 20W versus the Quadro K4100M's 100W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce MX350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX350) vs 350W (Quadro K4100M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce MX350	Quadro K4100M
TDP	20W-80%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	141.4+410%	27.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX350 came in at $250, while the Quadro K4100M launched at $1499. On MSRP, GeForce MX350 was 83.3% cheaper ($1249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.3 (GeForce MX350) vs 1.8 (Quadro K4100M) — the GeForce MX350 offers 527.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX350 (2020 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce MX350	Quadro K4100M
MSRP	$250-83%	$1499
Performance per Dollar	11.3+528%	1.8
Codename	GP107	GK104
Release	February 10 2020	July 23 2013
Ranking	#597	#604

Search GeForce MX350 on Amazon

Search Quadro K4100M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.