GeForce MX350
VS
Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

GeForce MX350 vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

NVIDIA

GeForce MX350

2020Core: 747 MHzBoost: 937 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

2018Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1500 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX350 is positioned at rank 348 and the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is on rank 5, so the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX350

#338
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
960%
#340
870%
#341
868%
#345
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
789%
#346
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
784%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
100%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
#350
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
98%
#351
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
98%
#354
Radeon R7 M370
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
96%
#357
Radeon 625
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
95%
#359
Radeon R7 M350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
94%
#360
GeForce 920MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $54
94%
#361
94%
#362
Radeon HD 7670A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
93%
#363
Radeon Vega 8
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

#1
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
155%
#5
Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX350.

InsightGeForce MX350Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity
Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX350 and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

NVIDIA

GeForce MX350

The GeForce MX350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,853 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX350 scores 2,828 and the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU reaches 2,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX350 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce MX350) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce MX350) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 937 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

FeatureGeForce MX350Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
G3D Mark Score
2,828
2,853
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 5.0
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
640
3584 ×2+460%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.199 TFLOPS
10.75 TFLOPS ×2+797%
Boost Clock
937 MHz
1500 MHz+60%
ROPs
16
64 ×2+300%
TMUs
32
224 ×2+600%
L1 Cache
240 KB
896 KB+273%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce MX350Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce MX350) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU) — the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce MX350Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX350 draws 20W versus the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU's 300W — a 175% difference. The GeForce MX350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX350) vs 350W (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce MX350Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
TDP
20W-93%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
141.4+1388%
9.5
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce MX350 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).

FeatureGeForce MX350Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
MSRP
$250
Avg Price (30d)
$200
Codename
GP107
Vega 10
Release
February 10 2020
August 26 2018
Ranking
#597
#592