GeForce MX350 vs GeForce GTX 770M
GeForce MX350
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 770M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX350 is positioned at rank 348 and the GeForce GTX 770M is on rank 54, so the GeForce GTX 770M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX350
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 770M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce MX350 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The GeForce MX350 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 770M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 770M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce MX350 | GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 770M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $200 for the GeForce MX350, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 392.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce MX350 | GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+392.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX350 and GeForce GTX 770M
GeForce MX350
The GeForce MX350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points.
GeForce GTX 770M
The GeForce GTX 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,784 points. Launch price was $189.99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX350 scores 2,828 and the GeForce GTX 770M reaches 2,784 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX350 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 770M uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce MX350) vs 960 (GeForce GTX 770M). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce MX350) vs 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770M). Boost clocks: 937 MHz vs 797 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,828+2% | 2,784 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 960+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.199 TFLOPS | 1.53 TFLOPS+28% |
| Boost Clock | 937 MHz+18% | 797 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB+200% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX350 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 770M has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 770M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce MX350) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 770M) — the GeForce MX350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 3 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 56 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX350 draws 20W versus the GeForce GTX 770M's 75W — a 115.8% difference. The GeForce MX350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX350) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 770M). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-73% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.4+281% | 37.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 770M costs 80% less ($160 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.1 (GeForce MX350) vs 69.6 (GeForce GTX 770M) — the GeForce GTX 770M offers 393.6% better value. The GeForce MX350 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $40-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.1 | 69.6+394% |
| Codename | GP107 | GK106 |
| Release | February 10 2020 | May 30 2013 |
| Ranking | #597 | #603 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX350 and GeForce GTX 770M
